WASHINGTON (PR) – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
today announced the publication of a final rule allowing employers that
provide retiree health benefits to continue the longstanding practice
of coordinating those benefits with Medicare (or comparable state
health benefits) without violating the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act (ADEA). The regulation, which safeguards retiree health benefits,
was published in today’s
Federal Register and is available on the EEOC’s web site at
www.eeoc.gov.
“Implementation
of this rule is welcome news for America’s retirees, whether young or
old,” said Commission Chair Naomi C. Earp. “By this action, the EEOC
seeks to preserve and protect employer-provided retiree health benefits
which are increasingly less available and less generous. Millions of
retirees rely on their former employer to provide health benefits, and
this rule will help employers continue to voluntarily provide and
maintain these critically important benefits in accordance with the
law.”
The EEOC proposed the rule in response to a
controversial decision in 2000 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit in Erie County Retirees Association v. County of Erie.
The court held that the ADEA requires that the health insurance
benefits received by Medicare-eligible retirees be the same, or cost
the employer the same, as the health insurance benefits received by
younger retirees. After the Erie County decision, labor
unions and employers alike informed the EEOC that complying with the
decision would force companies to reduce or eliminate the retiree
health benefits they currently provided – leaving millions of retirees
aged 55 and over with less health insurance, or no health insurance at
all.
EEOC Vice Chair Leslie E. Silverman said, “The Erie County
decision would have made most existing retiree health plans unlawful.
EEOC’s new rule will ensure that employers can continue to offer their
retirees much needed health benefits.” Silverman had testified on the
rule before the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging in 2004 and
before a subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and the
Workforce in 2005.
The Commission’s rule has the
support of key members of Congress, as well as the employer and labor
communities, including such major organizations as the Society for
Human Resource Management, the AFL-CIO, the American Federation of
Teachers, the National Education Association, the American Benefits
Council, and other influential groups.
Employers
who provide retiree health benefits generally “coordinate” those
benefits with Medicare by supplementing the government healthcare or by
offering retirees a “bridge” benefit to cover health expenses after
employees retire until they become Medicare-eligible. Until the 2000
interpretation, employers believed that the ADEA permitted them to
coordinate any retiree health benefits they provided with Medicare
without having to ensure that the benefits received by
Medicare-eligible retirees were the same as those received by younger
retirees.
To correct the problem, the new regulation
provides an exemption for ADEA coverage for this common and
longstanding employer practice. The Commission voted to approve this
regulation on April 22, 2004, but the AARP sued the EEOC in early 2005
to prevent its publication. After several years of litigation, the EEOC
emerged victorious as the Third Circuit Court of Appeals found that the
rule was “a reasonable, necessary and proper exercise of [EEOC’s]
authority.”
EEOC Legal Counsel Reed Russell said,
“Our rule makes clear that it is lawful for employers to continue to
provide retirees with the health benefits they currently receive.
Contrary to what some interest groups have erroneously asserted, the
rule will not require any cuts to retiree benefits.”
Posted on
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
by Brad Neese